The Rise and Fall of the Constitutional Tribunal in Austria (1919–1933)

Authors

  • Katarzyna Dunaj Nicolaus Copernicus Superior School (Szkoła Główna Mikołaja Kopernika)

Keywords:

Austria, Constitutional Tribunal, Austrian constitution, Hans Kelsen, he Reich Court (Reichsgericht)

Abstract

The establishment of the Constitutional Tribunal in Austria was the result of the constitutional evolution that took place in the Habsburg Monarchy in the second half of the 19th century and the change in the form of the state after the end of World War I. The forerunner of the Constitutional Tribunal was the Reich Court (Reichsgericht), which ruled on cases of violations of citizens’ constitutional rights. However, it was not until the Constitutional Tribunal was established at the beginning of 1919 that it was possible to assess the conformity of laws with the constitution.

The constitutional position of the Constitutional Tribunal was strengthened in the constitution of 1920. The main author of the constitution, as well as of the act establishing the Constitutional Tribunal, was Hans Kelsen. It should therefore come as no surprise that the Austrian Constitutional Tribunal reflected Kelsen’s model of the constitutional review of law from the very beginning of its existence. Dueto Hans Kelsen’s involvement, the constitutional court began its operations, which became a model solution for European states after World War II.

However, at the beginning of the 1930s, due to the dismantling of the democratic structures of the state, the Constitutional Tribunal came to an end in Austria. The article discusses the factors determining the establishment of the Constitutional Tribunal, its position in the constitution of 1920, the changes that took place in the constitutional regulation in the first ten years of the constitution’s validity, and the circumstances that contributed to the decline of the constitutional judiciary in the interwar Austria. The author analyses the evolution of the constitutional provisions defining the constitutional position of the Constitutional Tribunal against the background of the main directions of changes in the political system.

Author Biography

  • Katarzyna Dunaj, Nicolaus Copernicus Superior School (Szkoła Główna Mikołaja Kopernika)

    ORCID: 0000-0002-4788-6019

    dr hab. Katarzyna Dunaj – People of Science (Ludzie Nauki): database of the National Information Processing Institute (Ośrodek Przetwarzania Informacji – Państwowy Instytut Badawczy)

References

Adamovich Ludwig Karl, Funk Bernd‑Christian, Holzinger Gerhart, Frank Stefan Leo, Österreichisches Staatsrecht, Vienna 2011.

Bezemek Christoph, A Kelsenian Model of Constitutional Adjudication: The Austrian Constitutional Court, „Zeitschrift für öffentliches Recht” 2012, t. 67, s. 115–128.

Bongiovanni Giorgio, Rechtsstaat and Constitutional Justice in Austria: Hans Kelsen’s Contribution, [w:] The Rule of Law. History, Theory and Criticism, red. Pietro Costa, Danilo Zolo, Dordrecht 2007, s. 293–319.

Cole Taylor, Three Constitutional Courts: A Comparison, „The American Political Science Review” 1959, t. 53, nr 4, s. 963–984.

Czeszejko‑Sochacki Zdzisław, Sąd Konstytucyjny w systemie ustrojowym Austrii, [w:] Sądy konstytucyjne w Europie, t. 1: Austria, Francja, Niemcy, Włochy, red. Janusz Trzciński, Warszawa 1996, s. 11–27.

Dunaj Katarzyna, Constitutional Position of the President of Austria, [w:] Evolution of Constitutionalism in the Selected States of Central and Eastern Europe, red. Jarosław Matwiejuk, Krzysztof Prokop, Białystok 2010, s. 415–430.

Dunaj Katarzyna, Weimarski model prezydentury, Warszawa 2010.

Dziadzio Andrzej, Idea Trybunału Konstytucyjnego Georga Jellinka, [w:] Ustroje: historia i współczesność. Polska – Europa – Ameryka Łacińska. Księga jubileuszowa dedykowana profesorowi Jackowi Czajowskiemu, red. Marian Grzybowski, Grzegorz Kuca, Piotr Mikuli, Kraków 2013, s. 180–187.

Dziadzio Andrzej, Między ideą a praktyką ustrojową: o drodze Austrii do sądu konstytucyjnego, [w:] Sądownictwo konstytucyjne. Teoria i praktyka, t. II, red. Mirosław Granat, Warszawa 2019, s. 11–32.

Grabowski Radosław, Geneza i ewolucja ustroju politycznego Austrii, [w:] Związkowa Ustawa Konstytucyjna Republiki Austrii (tłum. Stanisław Sagan), red. Stanisław Sagan, Częstochowa 2002, s. 11–42.

Heller Kurt, Der Verfassungsgerichtshof. Die Entwicklung der Verfassungsgerichtsbarkeit in Österreich von den Anfängen bis zur Gegenwart, Wien 2010.

Kelsen Hans, Judicial Review of Legislation: A Comparative Study of the Austrian and the American Constitution, „The Journal of Politics” 1942, t. 4, nr 2, s. 183–200.

Olechowski Thomas, Die Einführung der Verwaltungsgerichtsbarkeit in Österreich, Wien 1999.

Osterkamp Jana, Verfassungsgerichtsbarkeit in der Tschechoslovakei (1920–1939).

Verfassungsidee – Demokratieverständniss – Nationalitätenproblem, Frankfurt am Main 2009.

Pawłowski Szymon, Tożsamość konstytucyjna Republiki Austrii, [w:] Tożsamość konstytucyjna w wybranych państwach członkowskich Unii Europejskiej, red. Andrzej Wróbel, Michał Ziółkowski, Warszawa 2021, s. 145–210.

Sarnecki Paweł, System konstytucyjny Austrii, Warszawa 1999.

Schmitz Georg, Die Vorentwürfe Hans Kelsens für die österreichische Bundesverfassung, Wien 1981.

Stourzh Gerald, Verfassung und Verfassungswirklichkeit Altösterreich in den Schriften Georg Jellinek, [w:] Georg Jellinek. Beiträge zu Leben und Werk, red. Stanley L. Paulson, Martin Schulte, Kiel‑Dresden 2000, s. 247–260.

Walter Robert, Hans Kelsen als Verfassungsrichter, Wien 2005.

Wiederin Ewald, Die Verfassungsgerichtsbarkeit in Österreich 1919–1939, „Beiträge zur Rechtsgeschichte Österreichs” 2022, nr 2, s. 276–286.

Zwierzchowski Eugeniusz, Sądownictwo konstytucyjne, Białystok 1994.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-04

How to Cite

The Rise and Fall of the Constitutional Tribunal in Austria (1919–1933). (2025). Miscellanea Historico-Iuridica, 24(1), 408–425. https://miscellanea.uwb.edu.pl/article/view/1638

Similar Articles

11-20 of 198

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.