Robert P. George’s Perfectionist Conception of Law
Keywords:perfectionism, new natural law theory, Robert P. George
I start this article by introducing the new natural theory and its best-known authors. I reconstruct their conception of law and I focus on Robert P. George and his speciﬁc conception of law and its role. According to George, there is no law without morality and law should always promote a certain conception of good life. It is through the law that a state imposes some moral values on its citizens. Therefore, among other functions of the legal system there is a perfectionist one. I also stress that George tries to promote such model through his own life and academic career by making his own public philosophy.
Bradley G.V.,The Moral Bases for Legal Regulation of Pornography, [w:] The Social Costs of Pornography. A Collection of Papers, red. J.R. Stoner Jr., D.M. Hughes, Princeton 2010.
Ceaser J.W., What is Public Philosophy, [w:] Public Philosophy and Political Science. Crisis and Reflection, red. E. Robert Statham Jr., Oxford 2002.
Dworkin G., Devlin Was Right: Law and the Enforcement of Morality, „William and Mary Law Review” 1999, t. 40, nr 3.
Finnis J., Natural Theory and Limited Government, [w:] Natural Law, Liberalism, and Morality, red. R.P. George, Oxford 2002.
Finnis J., Prawo naturalne i uprawnienia naturalne, Warszawa 2000.
George R.P., Gerard V.B., Brief Amicus Curiae of the Family Research Council, Inc. and Focus on the Family in Support of the Respondent, 2003.
George R.P., Making Children Moral: Pornography, Parents, and the Public Interest, [w:] R.P. George,The Clash of Orthodoxies. Law, Religion, and Morality in Crisis,Wilmington 2001.
George R.P., Making Men Moral. Civil Liberties and Public Morality, Oxford 2002.
George R.P., Natural Law and Positive Law, [w:] The Autonomy of Law. Essays on Legal Positivism, red. R.P. George, Oxford 2005.
George R.P., Natural Law, „American Journal of Jurisprudence” 2007, t. 52.
George R.P., Natural Law, „Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy” 2008, t. 31, nr 1.
George R.P., Natural Law, God, and Human Dignity, [w:] R.P. George, Conscience and Its Enemies, Wilmington 2013.
George R.P., The Concept of Public Morality, [w:] R.P. George, The Clash of Orthodoxies. Law, Religion, and Morality in Crisis, Wilmington 2001.
George R., Girgis S., Anderson R., Amici Curiae Brief of Robert P. George, Sherif Girgis, and Ryan T. Anderson in Support of Hollingsworth and Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group Addressing the Merits and Supporting Reversal, 2013.
Grisez G., The First Principle of Practical Reason: A Commentary on the „Summa Theologiae”, 1–2, q. 94 a. 2, “Natural Law Forum” 1965, t. 10.
Grisez G., Boyle J., Finnis J., Practical Principles, Moral, and Ultimate Ends, “The American Journal of Jurisprudence” 1987, nr 32.
Lippman W., Essays in Public Philosophy, 1955.
Miętek A., Miejsce Johna Mitchella Finnisa we współczesnej teorii prawa, „Dialogi Polityczne” 2007, nr 8.
Miętek A., Nowa teoria prawa naturalnego. Główne konteksty i problemy, „Dialogi Polityczne” 2008, nr 9.
Pigliucci M., Finkelman L., The Value of Public Philosophy to Philosophers, “Essays in Philosophy” 2014, t. 15, nr 1.
Reiman J., John Rawls’s New Conception of the Problem of Limited Government: Reply to Michael Zuckert, [w:] Natural Law, Liberalism, and Morality, red. R.P. George, Oxford 2002.
Romer v. Evans, 517 U.S.620 (1996).
Sandel M., Public Philosophy. Essays on Morality in Politics, Cambridge – London 2005.
Sandel M., Democracy’s Discontent. America in Search of Public Philosophy, Cambridge – London 1996.
Selznick P., A Humanist Science. Values and Ideals in Social Inquiry, Stanford 2008.
van Seters P., From Public Sociology to Public Philosophy: Lessons for Lawand Society, “Law & Social Inquiry” 2010, t. 35, nr 4.
Tinuré M.K., Finnis on Legal and Moral Obligation, [w:] Reason, Morality, and Law. The Philosophy of John Finnis, red. J. Keown, R.P. George, Oxford 2013.
Tollefsen C., Pure Perfectionism and the Limits of Paternalism, [w:] Reason, Morality, and Law, red. R.P. George, J. Keown, Oxford 2013.
Tully J., Public Philosophy in a New Key, t. 1, Cambridge 2008.
Weinstein J.R., What Does Public Philosophy Do? (Hint: It Does Not Make BetterCitizens), “Essays in Philosophy” 2014, t. 15, nr 1.
Zuckert M.P., Is Modern Liberalism Compatible with Limited Government? The Case of Rawls, [w:] Natural Law, Liberalism, and Morality, red. R.P. George, Oxford 2002.