Praetor as a Magistrate in the Ancient Rome. A Few Remarks

Authors

  • Piotr Kołodko University of Bialystok (Uniwersytet w Białymstoku)

Keywords:

pretorship, Roman public law, Roman law, magistrates of the Rome

Abstract

The main point of this text is an attempt to present a few duties of the praetor and try to stipulate the origins of them. First of all it should be noted that the term praetor was not consistently used to describe only the jurisdictional magistrate, and it was used in relation, for example, to the consuls. This was probably because the sound etymological sense of the word (praeire: “to go before, to precede, to lead the way”). The appointment of praetor urbanus in 367 BC under leges Licniae Sextiae was not associated with the need to carry out a jurisdictional competence. The origins of the magistrate were strictly military in its nature, which since the end of the third century BC gave way to the area of jurisdiction. Raised considerations apply also to the praetor for foreigners (praetor peregrinus), who has not resolved disputes between the Romans and foreigners (peregrini), and his role was to ensure the military security of Italy. The jurisdictional competence of the pretorship as the most “famous” begins to emerge in the late third century BC, which is likely to be linked not only with the increase in the number of praetors, but mainly obviates external threat from the Carthage. It seems to indicate that the jurisdictional competence (civil and criminal) was not assigned to pretorship at the beginning of this office. It appears at least at the end of the third century BC and starts to become predominant among others which were associated with this office in ancient Rome.

References

Alexander M.C., Law in the Roman republic, [w:] A Companion to the Roman Republic, eds. N. Rosenstein, R. Morstein-Marx, Malden–Oxford–Carlton 2006.

Arangio-Riuz V., Storia del diritto romano, Napoli 2006.

Bergk A., The Development of the Praetorship in the Third Century BC, [w:] Consules and Res publica. Holding High Office in the Roman Republic, red. H. Beck, A. Duplá, M. Jehne, F. Pina Polo, Cambridge 2011.

Biagio Conte G., Latin Literature: A History, tłum. J. Solodow, Baltimore 1994.

Bleicken J., Die Verfassung der römischen Republik. Grundlagen und Entwicklung, Paderborn 1975.

Brasiello U., Pretore «gaiano» e pretore «imperiale», [w:] Atti del congress internazionale di diritto Romano e di storia del diritto, Verona 27–28–29–IX–1948, red. G. Moschetti, t. 2, Milano 1953.

Bretone M., Tecniche e ideologie dei giuristi romani, Napoli 1982.

Burdese A., Manuale di diritto pubblico romano, Torino 1966.

Burdese A., s.v. magistrato (diritto romano), ED 1975, t. 25.

Capogrossi Colonesi L., Storia di Roma tra diritto e potere, Bologna 2009.

Cassola F., Labruna L., Il pretore, [w:] Lineamenti di storia del diritto romano, red. M. Talamanca, Milano 1989.

Cassola F., Labruna L., Le leggi Licinie Sestie, [w:] Lineamenti di storia del diritto romano, red. M. Talamanca, Milano 1989.

Coli U., Tribù e centurie dell’antica repubblica romana, „Studia et documenta historiae et iuris” 1955, nr 21.

Corey Brennan T., The Pretorship in the Roman Republic, t. 1, Oxford 2000.

Costabile F., Storia del diritto pubblico romano, Reggio Calabria 2011.

Crifò G., Lezioni di storia del diritto romano, Bologna 2005.

Daube D., The Peregrine Praetor, “Journal of Roman Studies” 1951, nr 41.

De Bujan y Fernandez A.F., Derecho publico romano y recepcion del derecho romano en europa, Madrid 1998.

de Martino F.M., Intorno all’origine della repubblica romana e delle magistature, [w:] ANRW I.1, Berlin–New York 1972.

de Martino F.M., Storia della costituzione romana, t. 1, Napoli 1972.

Dębiński A., Misztal-Konecka J., Wójcik M., Prawo rzymskie publiczne, Warszawa 2010.

Ernout A., Meillet A., Dictionnairé etymologique de la langue latine. Histoire de mots, Paris 1939, s.v. praetor.

Espistia Garzón F., Historia del derecho romano, Colombia 2006.

Flach D., Die Gesetze der frühen römischen Republik. Text und Kommentar, Darmstadt 1994.

Forsythe G., A Critical History of the early Rome. From the Prehistory to the First Punic War, Berkley–Los Angeles–London 2005.

Frost Abbott F., A History and Description of Roman Political Institutions, New York 1963.

Giaro T., Historia i tradycja prawa rzymskiego, [w:] W. Dajczak, T. Giaro, F. Longchamps de Bérier, Prawo rzymskie. U podstaw prawa prywatnego, Warszawa 2009.

Grosso G., Lezioni di storia del dirotto romanp, Torino 1955.

Guarino A., Storia del diritto romano, Napoli 1990.

Heuß A., Gedanken und Vermutungen zur frühen römischen Regierungsgewalt, Göttingen 1983.

Jolowicz H. F., Nicholas B., A Historical Introduction to the Study of Roman Law, Cambridge 1972.

Kaser M., Römische Rechtsgeschichte, Göttingen 1967.

Kołodko P., Ambitus w ustawodawstwie rzymskim V–IV w. p.n.e., [w:] Społeczeństwo a władza: ustrój, prawo, idee, red. J. Przygodzki, M.J. Ptak, Wrocław 2010.

Kołodko P., Ustawodawstwo rzymskie w sprawach karnych. Od ustawy XII tablic do dyktatury Sulli, Białystok 2012.

Kübler B., Geschichte des römischen Rechts, Aalen 1979 (Neudruck).

Kunkel W., Linee di storia giuridica romana, trad. di T. e B. Spanguolo Vigorita, Napoli 1973.

Kunkel W., Schermaier M., Römische Rechtsgeschichte13, Köln–Weimar–Wien 2001.

Kunkel W., Wittmann R., Staatsordnung und Staatspraxis der römischen Republik, t. 2: Die Magistratur, München 1995.

Kuryłowicz M., Wiliński A., Rzymskie prawo prywatne. Zarys wykładu, Warszawa 2008.

Lécrivain Ch., s.v. praetor, DS 1907, t. 4.1.

Lewandowski I., Historiografia rzymska, Poznań 2007.

Linderski J., Augural law, [w:] ANRW, t. II 16.3, Berlin–New York 1986.

Longo G., s.v. lex Valeria Horatia de tribunica potestate, NNDI 1961, t. 9.

Magdelain A., Praetor maximus et comitiatus maximus, „Iura” 1969, nr 20.

Mass M., John Lydus and the Roman Past, London 1992.

Mitchell R.E., Patricians and Plebeians: The Origin of the Roman State, New York–London 1990.

Momigliano A., Praetor maximus e quaestioni affiti, [w:] Studi in onore G. Grosso, Torino 1968.

Mommsen Th., Abriss des r ̈omischen Staatsrechts, Leipzig 1972.

Mommsen Th., Die römische Chronologie bis auf Caesar, Berlin 1859.

Mommsen Th., Römisches Staatsrecht, t. II.1, Graz 1969.

Nörr D., Pomponius oder “Zum Geschichtsverständnis der römischen Juristen”, [w:] ANRW II.15, Berlin–New York 1976.

Palmirski T., A History of the Ancient States’ political Systems. Rome, Kraków 2011.

Powell J.G.F., Dialogues and Treatises, [w:] A Companion to Latin Literature, ed. S. Harrison, Malden–Oxford–Carlton 2005.

Raggi A., Praetor qui iter peregrinos et cives ius dicit nel trattato tra Roma e i Lici (46 a.C.), [w:] Eparcheia, autonomia e civitas Romana. Studi sulla giurisdizione criminale dei governatori di provincia (II sec. a.C. – II sec. d.C.), red. D. Mantovani, L. Pellecchi, Pavia 2010.

Rainer J.M., Einführung in das Römische Staatsrecht. Die Anfänge und die Republik, Darmstadt 1997.

Rainer J.M., Römisches Staatsrecht, Darmstadt 2006.

Ramón Robles J., Magistrados, jueces y árbitros en Roma. Competencia civil y evolución, Madrid 2009.

Roman Statutes, ed. M.H. Crawford, t. II, London 1996.

Rotondi G., Leges publicae populi Romani. Elenco cronologico con una intoduzione sull’attività legislativa dei comizi romani, Milano 1912 (Nachdruck Hil-desheim 1966).

Sandys J.E., A History of Classical Scholarship: From the End of the Sixth Century B.C.to the End of the Middle Ages, t. I, Cambridge 1903 (reprint w 2010).

Serrao F., La «iurisdictio» del pretore peregrino, Milano 1954.

Siber H., Römisches Verfassungsrecht, Lahr 1952.

Stewart R., Public Office in Early Rome, Ann Arbor 1998.

Szczerbowski J., Prawo wyborcze, [w:] Rzymskie prawo publiczne. Wybrane zagadnienia, red. A. Jurewicz, R. Sajkowski, B. Sitek, J. Szczerbowski, A. Świętoń, Olsztyn 2011.

Tarwacka A., O początkach prawa i wszystkich urzędów oraz o następstwie prawników. 2 tytuł 1 księgi Digestów. Tekst – tłumaczenie – komentarz, „Zeszyty Prawnicze UKSW” 2003, nr 3.1.

Tellegen-Couperus O., Pontiff, praetor and iurisdictio in the Roman republic, TR 2006, nr 74.

Viñas A., Instituciones políticas y sociales en Roma: Monarquía y República, Madrid 2007.

Volkmann H., s.v. praetor, KlP 1972, nr 4.

von Lübtow U., Das römische Volk: Sein Staat und sein Recht, Frankfurt am Main 1955.

Walde A., Hoffman J.B., Lateinisches etymologisches Wörterbuch, t. II, Heidelberg 1954, s.v. praetor.

Weiss E., s.v. lex Licinia, RE 1925, t. 12.

Wesenberg G., Praetor maximus, ZSS 1947, nr 65.

Wesenberg G., s.v. praetor, RE 1954, t. 22.2.

Wieacker F., Römische Rechtsgeschichte, t. 1, München 1988.

Wilems P., Le droit public romain, Louvain 1874.

Wołodkiewicz W., Zabłocka M., Prawo rzymskie. Instytucje, Warszawa 2009.

Zabłoccy M. i J., Ustawa XII tablic. Tekst – tłumaczenie – objaśnienia, Warszawa 2003.

Zabłocki J., Tarwacka A., Publiczne prawo rzymskie, Warszawa 2011.

Downloads

Published

2013-12-15

How to Cite

Praetor as a Magistrate in the Ancient Rome. A Few Remarks. (2013). Miscellanea Historico-Iuridica, 12, 31-55. https://miscellanea.uwb.edu.pl/article/view/236

Similar Articles

1-10 of 365

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)