Historical Conditions of the Development of the Institution of Mediation in Collective Labor Disputes in the United States
Keywords:
mediation, labor unions, history of American collective labor law, mediators, collective bargaining agreement, strikeAbstract
The purpose of this article is to analyze the historical conditions of the development of the institution of mediation in collective labor disputes in the United States. The unique historical conditions that fundamentally influenced the level of use of mediation as a form of dispute resolution, both in the early days of its development in the US and today, need to be characterized. The characterization involves a consideration of the introduction of regulations that initiated the use of mediation at the state and then federal levels. The reach of mediation in collective disputes expanded from its original use in the transportation (railroads and airlines) sectors to its subsequent application in most labor disputes in the private sector. Mediation became institutionalized, as well as professionalized, thanks to the important support activities of the federal government and the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Services (FMCS). Therefore, it should be considered important to look at the actions taken by the government in the past to promote the use of the institution of mediation, including through the formation of bodies (councils) that contributed to the professionalization of the profession of mediator. The issues presented herein are relevant because mediation in the United States has reached a high level of development and overall success. An analysis of these issues becomes useful in the light of the interest in the process of implementation of the American mediation model by other countries. The sources used in the article are American publications that discuss the historical development of mediation in the US, the relevant legislation, and selected case law.
References
United Steelworks of America v. American Mfg. Co., 363 U.S. 564 (1960).
United Steelworkers of America v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co., 363 U.S. 574 (1960).
United Steelworkers of America v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Co., 363 U.S. 593 (1960).
III. Collective Bargaining in the Public Sector, Harvard Law Review 1984, vol. 97.
Baker Drew, The Not So Friendly Skies: Pilots’ Attempt to Claim Employer Collusion with Rival Pilots Union During Collective Bargaining Fails in Beckington, “Journal of Air Law and Commerce” 2020, vol. 85.
Barnes Richard, FMCS on the Cutting Edge, “Pepperrdine Dispute Resolution Law Journal” 2002, vol. 2.
Barrett Jerome, The FMCS contribution to nonlabor dispute resolution, https://www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/1985/08/art4full.pdf.
Barrett Jerome, Notes on: Mediation Institutions Adjusting to New Environments: The USCS and FMCS Story, “Labor Law Journal” 2017, vol. 68, no. 1.
Barrett Jerome, The Origin of Labor-Management Mediation: United States Conciliation Service in the U.S., Department of Labor, “Labor Law Journal” 2016, vol. 67, no. 4.
Brommer Carolyn, Buckingham George, Loeffle Steven, Cooperative Bargaining Styles at FMCS: A Movement Towards Choices, “Pepperrdine Dispute Resolution Law Journal” 2002.
Brover J., Using Mediation to Get NHL Players Back in the Winter Olympics, “Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution” 2020, vol. 22.1.
Davies Ross, Strike Season: Protecting Labor-Management Conflict in the Age of Terror, “Georgetown Law Journal” 2005, vol. 93.
Goldman Alvin, Comparative Analysis of Labor Mediation Using a Bargaining Strength Model, “Kentucky Law Journal” 1993–1994, vol. 82.
Heilman Michael J., The National Labor Relations Act at Fifty: Roots Revisited, Heart Rediscovered, “Duquesne Law Review”, vol. 23.
Kramer Henry, Alternative Dispute Resolution in the Work Place, §2.04 (New York 2004).
LeRoy Michael H., Federal Jurisdiction in Sports Labor Disputes, “Utah Law Review” 2012.
Lobel Ira, What Mediation Can and Cannot Do, “Dispute Resolution Journal” 1998, vol. 53, 47.
Lofaso Anne Marie, Deflategate: What’s the Steelworkers Trilogy Got to Do with It?, “Berkeley Journal of Entertainment and Sports Law” 2017, vol. 6.
Maccini K.S., When is Mediation a Good Choice for Your Client?, “Rhode Island Bar Journal” 2017, vol. 65, no. 4.
Malin Martin H., Finkin Matthew W., Are Collective Bargaining Agreements Still Special?, “American Bar Association Journal of Labor & Employment Law” 2023, vol. 37.
Malin Martin H., Public Employees’ Right to Strike: Law and Experience, “University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform” 1993, vol. 26.
McManus Jeremy, A Motion to Compel Changes to Federal Arbitration Law: How to Remedy the Abuses Consumers Face When Arbitrating Disputes, “Boston College Journal of Law & Social Justice” 2017, vol. 37.
Noakes Adam, Mandatory Early Mediation: A Vision for Civil Lawsuits Worldwide, “Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution” 2020, vol. 36.
Ray D.E., Corbett W.R., Ruiz Cameron Christopher David, Labor-Management Relations: Strikes, Lockouts and Boycotts, § 1:18 (Sept. 2017).
Ruiz Fernando A., Labor Law – The Railway Labor Act: The Employee’s Right to Minority Union Representation at Company-Level Grievance Hearings, “Western New England Law Review” 1989, vol. 11.
Schmedemann D.A., Reconciling Differences: The Theory and Law of Mediating Labor Grievances, “Industrial Relations Law JournalL 1987, vol. 9.
Slater Joseph E., Lessons from the Public Sector: Suggestions and a Caution, “Marquette Law Review” 2011, vol. 94.
Slater Joseph., Interest Arbitration as Alternative Dispute Resolution: The History from 1919 to 2011, “Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution” 2013, vol. 28.
Slater Joseph, The Teachers’ Strike of 2018 in Historical Perspective, “Marquette Benefits and Social Welfare Law Review” 2019, vol. 20.
Smith Todd A., A Comparative Analysis: The Effect of American and Canadian Labor Laws and Economic Conditions on Union Participation, “The George Washington Journal of International Law and Economics” 1991, vol. 24.
Weckstein Donald T., In Praise of Party Empowerment--and of Mediator Activism, “Willamette Law Review 1997”, vol. 33, no. 3.
Zelek Mark E., Labor Grievance Arbitration in the United States, “The University of Miami Inter-American Law Review” 1989, vol. 21.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Miscellanea Historico-Iuridica

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.